Policy Property Damage Property Insurance 
The Property Insurance Law Observer
MARCH 20, 2025
Hawley Insurance Co. 2025)), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York determined that the plaintiff lacked an insurable interest in property it insured because it did not own or possess the property or suffer economic loss due to the propertys destruction.
The Property Insurance Law Observer
OCTOBER 9, 2024
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company (2024 WL 3952571), the court affirmed that unambiguous policy limits remain enforceable even when an appraisal award exceeds those limits. This decision provides valuable guidance for insurers handling post-catastrophe claims. The appraisal award exceeded the policy limits for certain items.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Mark Jackson Insurance Agency
MARCH 19, 2025
From property protection to liability coverage, ensuring your business insurance policies align with your expansion is critical. Without the right coverage, unforeseen challenges—such as property damage, employee injuries, or legal issues—could put your investment at risk.
The Property Insurance Law Observer
MARCH 25, 2024
March 11, 2024), the Court determined that the plaintiff property owner, as an additional insured, was not entitled to the same insurance coverage as the named insured where the builder’s risk policy limited the scope of recovery for soft costs and rental income.
The Property Insurance Law Observer
FEBRUARY 25, 2025
However, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer on the bad faith claim, emphasizing that a thorough investigation into a questionable claim does not amount to bad faith Background Spinnaker Insurance Company (Spinnaker) issued a homeowners policy to Donald Jackson (Jackson) for a designated residence premises.
The Property Insurance Law Observer
FEBRUARY 14, 2024
29, 2024)), the Court determined that the term “windstorm” was ambiguous as utilized in the subject insurance policy. The insureds suffered property damage caused by a tornado and subsequently submitted a claim to their insurer. Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (2024 WL 322297 (Tex. Dallas Jan.
The Property Insurance Law Observer
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024
American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company , the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that a loose bolt or fitting that could be remedied simply by tightening it did not constitute “direct physical loss of or damage” to equipment covered under an all-risk property insurance policy. [1]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content